Skip to content

Conversation

@bicschneider
Copy link
Collaborator

@bicschneider bicschneider commented Dec 18, 2025

Only test during debug

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Reduce startup overhead by performing debug initialization and auxiliary lookups only when debugging is explicitly enabled (via debug flag or argument), avoiding unnecessary checks and external utility invocations during normal runs. This streamlines control flow and minimizes incidental side effects when debugging is not active.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@bicschneider bicschneider requested a review from Copilot December 18, 2025 13:27
@bicschneider bicschneider self-assigned this Dec 18, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

The main script now sets arg_debug when debug is enabled (also enabling set -x) and only invokes git-sh-setup when arg_debug is non-empty; previously git-sh-setup was called unconditionally. No other logic or exported API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Main script (debug gating)
.../main
Added arg_debug set when debug is "true" (enables set -x); changed git-sh-setup invocation to run only if arg_debug is non-empty. Removed unconditional initialization of arg_debug in real flag parsing.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5–10 minutes

  • Review focus: verify the debug-condition correctly triggers git-sh-setup only when intended and ensure skipping it in normal runs does not break setup assumptions.

Poem

🐰
I nibble the debug carrot bright,
Only then I call the setup light.
Quiet hops when flags are low,
Loud digs out when debug's aglow. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing the git-sh-setup missing problem by making its invocation conditional on debug mode.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch gh-45-fix-missing-git-sh-setup

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 288f431 and cea29dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • git-artifact (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • git-artifact

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2e2d06 and 34225fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • git-artifact (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: MadsNielsen
Repo: Praqma/git-artifact PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-28T13:26:41.036Z
Learning: In git-artifact bash script, the fetch-co|push command validation logic that requires "at least one of -t|--tag <tag> or -b|--branch" was already present before PR #40 and was not introduced by that PR. PR #40 only removed git-sh-setup dependency and replaced require_work_tree with need_workspace().
📚 Learning: 2025-08-28T13:26:41.036Z
Learnt from: MadsNielsen
Repo: Praqma/git-artifact PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-28T13:26:41.036Z
Learning: In git-artifact bash script, the fetch-co|push command validation logic that requires "at least one of -t|--tag <tag> or -b|--branch" was already present before PR #40 and was not introduced by that PR. PR #40 only removed git-sh-setup dependency and replaced require_work_tree with need_workspace().

Applied to files:

  • git-artifact

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR addresses issue gh-45 by conditionalizing the which git-sh-setup command to only run during debug mode, preventing issues when git-sh-setup is not available.

Key Changes:

  • Wrapped the which git-sh-setup test command in a debug-only conditional block

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

git-artifact Outdated
shift

which git-sh-setup
[[ ${debug:-} == true ]] && {
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This condition has two issues: (1) it references debug but the debug flag is stored in arg_debug throughout the file (set to 1 on line 526), and (2) it compares against the string "true" but arg_debug is set to 1, not "true". As a result, this condition will never evaluate to true and the which command will never execute. Consider using a condition like test -n "${arg_debug:-}" which is the pattern used by the debug function on line 120.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@bicschneider bicschneider force-pushed the gh-45-fix-missing-git-sh-setup branch from 34225fd to 288f431 Compare December 18, 2025 13:38
@bicschneider bicschneider force-pushed the gh-45-fix-missing-git-sh-setup branch from 288f431 to cea29dc Compare December 18, 2025 13:41
@bicschneider bicschneider merged commit 23d78a9 into main Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants